THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SPECIFICS OF YOUNG SINGLE PEOPLE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2021.2.8

Keywords:

single, singlehood, singleness, romantic loneliness, voluntary singlehood, involuntary singlehood, romantic relationship, psychological characteristics, stigmatization, young adults

Abstract

The article represents the results of an empirical study of the psychological characteristics of young single people. Singleness is viewed as a certain social status in it. The purpose of this work is to clarify the psychological characteristics that are representative of involuntary and voluntary singlehood of young people. The study views the “voluntary singleness” as a lack of willingness to take on a romantic partner, as long as “involuntary singleness” is a conscious desire to have one. The theoretical overview represents the current stay of study of singleness phenomenon in psychology. It displays the basic theoretical approach, that is used for resolving of problem. In particular the article draws to evolutionary and feminist approach. A number of psychological states that accompany romantic loneliness and the consequences of it are mentioned. It is established the scales “hypochondriasis”, “depression”, “hysteria”, “psychopathic deviate”, “paranoia”, “psychasthenia”, “schizophrenia”, “negative perception of the past”, “perception of the fatalistic present” and “rigidity of emotions” have statistically significant differences between involuntary and involuntary single people. These features are more characteristic of people who intend to have a romantic relationship. At the same time, it has been proven that voluntary single people have a higher level of psychological well-being, self-acceptance and self-esteem. They evaluate their relationships with others are more positively, open to new experiences and strive for development more, then involuntary single ones. It has been proven that individuals who show a reluctance to get close to others on an emotional basis are more insecure the desire to enter into a romantic relationship than people who do not have obstacles in establishing emotional contact with others. The first group is characterized as more introverted, anxious, synthetic, socially maladapted, suspicious, emotionally detached and rigid. 

References

Абрамова С.Б. Сознательное одиночество: социальная проблема или альтернативная модель брачно-семейных отношений? Социология в ХХI веке: традиции и инновации в методологии и методике социологических исследований. Уральский федеральный университет, 2017. С. 822–832.

Аршава І.Ф., Монахович Д.Р. Психологічні особливості самотніх молодих осіб. Modern scientific researches, 2020. № 14(3). С. 96–101.

Аршава І.Ф., Монахович Д.Р. Психологічні особливості переживання статусу самотності молодими людьми. Особистість, сім’я, суспільство: питання педагогіки та психології : збірник тез наукових робіт учасників міжнародної науково-практичної конференції. Львів : ГО «Львівська педагогічна спільнота», 2020. С. 8–11.

Apostolou M. Singles’ Reasons for Being Single: Empirical Evidence From an Evolutionary Perspective. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00746 (дата звернення: 17.03.2021).

Benato R., Milestone K., Meyer A. Gender and Popular Culture. Feminism & Psychology. 2013. Vol. 23 (2). P. 262–264.

Budgeon S. The ‘problem’ with single women: Choice, accountability and social change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2016. Vol. 33, Issue 3. P. 401–418.

Buss D.M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989. No. 12 (1). P. 1–49.

DePaulo B.M. Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry. 2005. No. 16 (2/3). P. 57–83.

Farrell D. What’s Wrong with Being Single: Lowered Relational Value Bias Toward Single People : a thesis submitted to the faculty of the graduate school in candidacy for the degree of master of arts, program in applied social psychology. Chicago, 2018. 46 p.

Slonim G. By choice or by circumstance? Stereotypes of and feelings about single people. Studia Psychologica. 2015. No. 57. P. 35–48.

Published

2021-09-28