PROTECTION OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A COMPONENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.5.3

Keywords:

intangible cultural heritage, culture, international protection, national states, state policy, human rights

Abstract

The article examines the problem of intangible cultural heritage protection in the context of human rights protection. The relationship between intangible cultural heritage and human rights is substantiated, in particular, the fact that the very feature of intangible cultural heritage as a fundamental element of the identity of its creators and bearers implies corresponding consequences from the point of view of the protection of cultural human rights. It is shown that the implementation of the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that the collective rights of the community, of which the relevant persons are members, are properly protected. The protection of intangible cultural heritage is an important prerequisite for ensuring the effectiveness of certain human rights for the benefit of relevant individuals and communities. From a practical point of view, this means requiring states to ensure that such individuals and communities have adequate access to their intangible cultural heritage and participate in its management. It is shown that this means an obligation not only to avoid direct interference by public officials in the use of their intangible heritage by the communities and individuals concerned, but also to create appropriate conditions to ensure the specific and effective use of the heritage by such communities and individuals, in the light of their specific expectations and needs. In the opinion of the author, the state policy in the field of protection of intangible cultural heritage has insufficient tools and seems to be insufficient to ensure appropriate protection of features of intangible heritage. It was determined that the international community cannot tolerate cultural manifestations that turn into effects that are absolutely unacceptable in light of the primary value of human dignity. According to the author, it is very important that any manifestation of intangible cultural heritage is compatible with several basic legal norms that reflect values, the fundamental characteristic of which prevails even the value of cultural diversity. It is necessary, in particular, that any cultural expression complies with human rights norms. However, this does not mean that no deviations from internationally recognized human rights can be accepted in the name of cultural diversity.

References

UN GA Res. 217A (III), 1948, UN Doc. A/ 810 (1948).

999 UNTS 171.

Human Rights Committee, General Comment 22, Art. 18 (Forty-eighth session, 1993), UN Doc. HRI GEN1Rev.1 at 35 (1994), para. 4 (emphasis added).

General Comment 23, Article 27 (Fiftieth session, 1994), UN Doc. HRIGEN1Rev.1 at 38 (1994), para. 6.2. 5. UN GA Res. 44/25 (1989).

Human Rights Committee, General Comment 3, Article 2 – Implementation at the national level (Thirteenth session, 1981), UN Doc. HRIGEN1Rev. 1 at 4 (1994), para. 1.

OAS Treaty Series № 36.

Case of Moiwana Village v. Suriname, Series C. № 124, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Repara- tions and Costs, judgment of 15 June 2005. www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/ seriec_124_ing.pdf. at paras 98ff.

Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, at para. 92.

Case of Moiwana Village v. Suriname, Series C № 145, Interpretation of the Judgment of Merits, Reparations and Costs, judgment of 8 Feb. 2006. www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/ seriec_145_ing.pdf 11. 993 UNTS 3.

General Comment № 14 (2000). The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4 of 11 Aug. 2000, at para. 27.

Lenzerini. Riflessioni sul valore della diversità culturale nel diritto internazionale. 56 Comunità Internazionale (2001) 671.

Brown. Safeguarding the Intangible. Cultural Comment, Nov. 2003. www. culturalpolicy.org/commons/comment-print.cfm?ID=12

Published

2023-11-30