CAUSES AND FORMS OF CORRUPTION MANIFESTATIONS IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THEORETICAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.6.9

Keywords:

corruption, public administration, bribery, favoritism, nepotism, clientelism

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical aspects of the current scientific problem of the causes and forms of corrupt practices in public administration. It emphasizes that corruption is a major obstacle to economic development and the effective functioning of the state governance system. The author examines social-psychological, socio-political, economic, and legal factors that determine the reasons for corrupt behavior in public administration. Among the social-psychological reasons, cultural factors such as family and friendship relations, the desire to earn, and traditions are highlighted. Socio-political factors include the passivity of society and insufficient awareness of corruption as a global danger. Economic factors encompass the profitability of corrupt actions as a competitive advantage and a resource for officials’ enrichment. Legal and organizational-management aspects are also considered in the theoretical analysis. The author identifies various forms of corruption, including bribery, lobbying, favoritism, nepotism, and clientelism. Bribery is examined in detail as a mutual agreement between the bribe giver and the official to influence the latter’s actions. Lobbying is defined as a practice aimed at advocating and implementing the interests of citizens, businesses, and organizations. Favoritism, nepotism, and clientelism are also analyzed as forms of corrupt practices. Favoritism is defined as obtaining patronage and privileges by public officials based on mutual promises and unequal relationships with those in power and their subordinates. The article highlights how this form of corruption creates conditions for excessive well-being within the chosen group of individuals. Based on the provided definitions, it is evident that the essence of practically all forms of corrupt practices lies in providing individuals in positions of power with specific privileges and advantages, as well as appointing them to certain positions and offering various forms of support to achieve their personal selfish goals. This is a comprehensive approach that encompasses various forms of corruption, including bribery, favoritism, nepotism, clientelism, and others. The author underscores that restrictions on civil rights and the increase in administrative barriers contribute to the emergence and rooting of corruption. The importance of further improving prevention and anticorruption measures in the context of globalization and modernization is emphasized.

References

Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I.. E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2022. P. 1-17.

Bereziuk, S. Yaremchuk, N. Corruption as a destructive factor of economic development. The scientific heritage. 2020. № 47-6. Р. 11–21.

Güemes Cecilia. Wish you were here trust in public administration in Latin America. Revista de Administracao Publica, 2020. № 53. Р. 1067–1090.

Сирота Д., Сергієнко А. Даценко Л. Кримінальна відповідальність та профілактика корупції. Наука і техніка сьогодні. 2023. 13 (27). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2023-13(27)-189-202 (дата звернення 06.01.2024)

Шевченко С.О., Сидоренко Н. С. Сутність поняття політичної корупції та її небезпеки в Україні. Становлення публічного адміністрування в Україні : матеріали VІІІ Всеукр. міжвуз. конф. студентів та молодих учених / за заг. ред. С. О. Шевченка. Д. : ДРІДУ НАДУ .2019. 101-106

Сидоренко Н. С. Удосконалення підходу до державного управління в сфері освіти України з урахуванням передового досвіду країн ЄС . Держава та регіони. Серія : Державне управління. 2020. № 2 (70). С. 139–143. URL : https://er.dduvs.in.ua/handle/123456789/5396 (дата звернення 01.01.2024)

Сидоренко Н., Шевченко С. Електронне урядування та ІКТ як інструменти протидії корупції у контексті світового тренду прозорості публічної служби. Аспекти публічного управління. Вип. 5, С. 72–81. 2020. URL : http://www.aspects.org.ua/ (дата звернення 01.01.2024)

Стельмах А.В. Розвиток інституту лобізму як основи забезпечення державної безпеки України : дис. на здоб. наук. ступ. канд. наук з держ. упр. : 25.00.05. Харків, 2021. 213 с.

Encyclopædia Britannica (15:e upplagan). Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. 556 р.

Титко А. В. Фаворитизм, непотизм, кронізм, клієнтелізм як форми конфлікту інтересів: quid pro. Форум права. 2019. № 2. С. 80–90. URL : http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index. (дата звернення 06.01.2024)

Çuhadar Seyran Gürsoy. Sosyal politika ile klientalizm ilişkisi; gıda bankacılığı üzerinden bir değerlendirme. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2017. 2.53. Р. 681–702.

Published

2023-12-30