PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL RESILIENCE PROCESSES AT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY LEVEL: GENERAL APPROACHES, PRINCIPLES, AND INNOVATIVE TOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2025.2.7Keywords:
public administration, local self-government, territorial community, resilience, sustainable development, local self-government authority, international standard, EU experience, ISOAbstract
The article proposes a conceptual model for ensuring national resilience at the local community level, which combines the national level contour (reproducing the process of ensuring the security and continuity of the functioning of the main spheres of life of the state and society through the use of a set of appropriate tools by the subjects of the national sustainability system in conditions of hybrid threats and changes in the security environment) and the local contour (demonstrates the basic components of the mechanism that processually links a set of adaptive capabilities with measures of institutional resilience through the development of a strategy for preparedness for extraordinary events). Emphasis is placed on the fact that the contribution of local contours of territorial communities ensures the formation of national resilience and the further sustainable development of the country as a whole. It is concluded that the effectiveness of the proposed model is ensured by the implementation of a set of basic principles for building a system of public management of processes to ensure national resilience at the level of the territorial community: flexibility, standardization, and unity of efforts. The aspects of the territorial communities' ability to ensure resilience/stability at the local level have been systematized, in particular, the implementation of proactive adaptive public management models based on the development of interaction and broad involvement of stakeholders and the formation of comprehensive control systems at the regional and local levels, in particular public control over the use of resources. It is emphasized that in the context of wartime challenges and subsequent post-war recovery, there is an urgent need to introduce sustainable development management systems in domestic territorial communities based on the international standard ISO 37101.
References
Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 20 serpnia 2021 roku “Pro zaprovadzhennia natsionalnoi systemy stiikosti” : Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy № 479/2021 [On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated August 20, 2021, “On the introduction of a national resilience system”: Decree of the President of Ukraine № 479/2021] (2021, 27 September). https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/4792021-40181 [in Ukrainian].
Ministry of Development of Communities, Territories, and Infrastructure of Ukraine. (2023). Dorozhnia karta detsentralizatsii: reforma mistsevoho samovriaduvannia ta terytorialnoi orhanizatsii vlady [Roadmap for decentralization: reform of local self-government and territorial organization of power]. https://decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/attachment/document/1330/Дорожня_карта_децентралізації.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Mamatova, T., & Borysenko, V. (2023). Teoretychne pidgruntia doslidzhennia protsesiv publichnoho upravlinnia u sferi zabezpechennia rezilientnosti terytorialnykh hromad v Ukraini [Theoretical basis for the study of the public administration processes in the domain of local ccommunities’ resilience in Ukraine]. Public Administration and Local Government, (2), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.32782/2414-4436/2023-2-9 [in Ukrainian].
Pyrozhkov, S. I., Maiboroda, O. M., Khamitov, N. V., Holovakha, Ye. I., Dembitskyi, S. S., Smolii, V. A., Skrypniuk, O. V., & Stoietskyi S. V. (Eds). (2022). Natsionalna stiikist Ukrainy: stratehiia vidpovidi na vyklyky ta vyperedzhennia hibrydnykh zahroz : natsionalna dopovid [Ukraine's national resilience: a strategy for responding to challenges and anticipating hybrid threats: national report]. Kyiv : I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/nats_dopovyd.pdf.
Holling, C. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4 (1), 1-23. https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/bdg/pdfs_bdg/2013/Holling%201973.pdf.
Rabinovych M., Brik T., Darkovich A., Savisko M., Hatsko V., Tytiuk S., Piddubnyi I. Explaining Ukraine’s resilience to Russia’s invasion: The role of local governance. Governance. 2023. Vol. 37, Iss. 4, P. 1121-1140. https://doi. org/10.1111/gove.12827.
Bashtannyk, O. V. (2023). Vymiry rozbudovy natsionalnoi systemy stiikosti u konteksti vnutrishno i zovnishnopolitychnykh priorytetiv Ukrainy. Публічне управління і адміністрування в Україні. [Measures for developing a national stability system in the context of Ukraine's domestic and foreign policy priorities]. Public management and administration in Ukraine, (36), 7-11. https://pag-journal.iei.od.ua/archives/2023/36-2023/1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Bashtannyk, O. V. (2024). Instytutsionalni imperatyvy systemnoi rozbudovy natsionalnoi stiikosti derzhavy [Institutional imperatives for the systematic development of national resilience]. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, and Law, (2), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.2.1 [in Ukrainian].
Kravtsov, O. (2024). Rol derzhavnoho upravlinnia v rozbudovi natsionalnoi modeli stiikosti v tsyfrovomu suspilstvi [The role of public administration in developing a national model of sustainability in a digital society]. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, and Law, (4), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.4.1.
Reznikova, O. O., & Voitovskyi, K. Ye. (2021). Problema terminolohichnoi nevyznachenosti u sferi rozbudovy natsionalnoi stiikosti : analitychna zapyska [The problem of terminological uncertainty in the field of national resilience building: analytical note]. Center for Security Studies, National Institute for Strategic Studies. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2021-01/az-7-gloss-060121_5.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Reznikova, O. O. (2022). Natsionalna stiikist v umovakh minlyvoho bezpekovoho seredovyshcha : monohrafiia [National resilience in a changing security environment: monograph]. Kyiv : National Institute for Strategic Studies https://doi.org/10.53679/NISS-book.2022.01
The International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 37100:2016(en). Sustainable cities and communities – Vocabulary. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:71914:en
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2017). National Incident Management System. Third Edition. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_nims_doctrine-2017.pdf.
Mamatova, T. V., & Ihnat, O. V. (2024). Innovatsiini instrumenty zabezpechennia rezultatyvnosti i efektyvnosti protsesiv staloho rozvytku terytorii i hromad v umovakh nevyznachenosti [Innovative tools to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of territorial and community sustainable development processes within the context of uncertainty]. The State and Regions. Series: Public Management and Administration, (4), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2024.4.33 [in Ukrainian].
The International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 37101:2016. Sustainable development in communities. Management system for sustainable development. Requirements with guidance for use. https://www.iso.org/standard/61885.html.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
