INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVES OF THE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT THE NATIONAL RESILIENCE OF THE STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.2.1Keywords:
institution, institutional imperatives, institutional capacity, national stability, public administrationAbstract
The author substantiates in the article, that since the nowadays political processes are characterized by a high degree of variability and uncertainty, the exacerbation of conflict in the system of social relations, an urgent task is to improve the government mechanisms of state power institutions based on the public government concept of resilience. From these positions, it is expedient to consider institutional imperatives that specify the fundamental values of the implementation of public administration as an object of research. Institutional imperatives become important in the context of building a government system for the resilience of the national state, which is especially relevant for Ukraine in connection with the challenges of resisting the russian federation armed aggression and the future task of post-war reconstruction. The purpose of the study is the conceptualization of institutional imperatives in terms of the system development of the state national resilience main parameters as an object of research in the science of public administration. As a result of the conducted research, it was established that today there is an urgent need to expand the scope of the specified problem study and the implementation of government in the field of institutional support to algorithms for the functioning analysis of the existing government institutes. For this purpose, it is worth formulating and formalizing the existing institutional imperatives, showing the possibilities of post-crisis recovery and maintaining the sustainable development of the political system of society as a whole. Therefore, the study of the foundations problems of ensuring the national system of resilience allows us to formulate the following institutional imperatives: normative definition and interpretation of the concept content of national resilience by the institutions of state power; formation by civil society institutions of the widest social consensus regarding the features of the national system of resilience; reforming the institutions of executive power in order to transform the system of public administration and the political system as a whole.
References
Przeworski, A. (2004). Institutions Matter? Government and Opposition, 39, 527-540.
Lane, J.-E. (2014). Institutionality: “Institution” and “Institutions Matter”. Open Journal of Political Science, 4, 23-30.
Kant, I. (1930). Lectures On Ethics. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
Yermolenko, A. (2015). Katehorychnyi moralnyi imperatyv v istoryko-filosofskykh paradyhmakh [Categorical moral imperative in historical and philosophical paradigms]. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho universytetu. Filosofski i psykholohichni nauky. - Bulletin of the Prykarpatsky University. Philosophical and psychological sciences, 19, 39-47 [in Ukrainian].
Kovalchuk, M.V. (2014). Imperatyvy ekonomichnoi bezpeky derzhavy: instytutsionalnyi pidkhid [Imperatives of economic security of the state: an institutional approach]. Efektyvna ekonomika - Efficient economy, 11. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efek_2014_11_94 [in Ukrainian].
Ivashyna, O.F. & Kovalchuk, M.V. (2016). Priorytetni napriamky udoskonalennia instytutsionalnykh imperatyviv ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Priority areas of improvement of institutional imperatives of economic security of Ukraine]. Innovatsiina ekonomika - Innovative economy, 9-10, 52-56 [in Ukrainian].
Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 20 serpnia 2021 roku “Pro zaprovadzhennia natsionalnoi systemy stiikosti”, Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy № 479/2021 [On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated August 20, 2021 “On the introduction of the national stability system”, Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 479/2021] (2021) (Ukraina). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/479/2021#Text [in Ukrainian].
Kolomiitsev, P. (2020). Konstytutsiina zakonnist yak metod ta meta zdiisnennia derzhavnoi vlady [Constitutional legality as a method and purpose of exercising state power]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo - Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 6, 168-172 [in Ukrainian].
Danylenko, L.I. (2023). Suspilnyi konsensus – efektyvna tekhnolohiia antykryzovoho upravlinnia u systemi mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Social consensus – an effective technology of anti-crisis management in the system of local self-government]. Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity. Seriia : Sotsialni ta povedinkovi nauky - Bulletin of post-diploma education. Series: Social and behavioral sciences, 23, 118-132 [in Ukrainian].
Selskyi, A.A. (2013). Stratehiia i derzhavne upravlinnia yak peredumovy tekhnolohichnosti stratehichnoho upravlinnia [Strategy and state management as prerequisites for the technology of strategic management]. Ekonomika ta derzhava - Economics and the state, 5, 124-126 [in Ukrainian].
Lobko, M.M., Fuchko, A.Y. & Kopystyra, V.M. (2021). Instytutsiina model systemy oborony Ukrainy [Institutional model of the defense system of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Tsentru voienno-stratehichnykh doslidzhen Natsionalnoho universytetu oborony Ukrainy imeni Ivana Cherniakhovskoho - Collection of scientific works of the Center for Military and Strategic Research of the Ivan Chernyakhovsky National University of Defense of Ukraine, 1, 82-86 [in Ukrainian].
Viter, D. & Rudenko, O. (2014). Teoretychne osmyslennia idealnoi sutnosti hromadianskoho suspilstva [Theoretical understanding of the ideal essence of civil society]. In Rozvytok hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini: mynule, suchasnist, perspektyvy [Development of civil society in Ukraine: past, present, perspectives] (pp. 21-46). IHSU, Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia” [in Ukrainian].
Postol, O.Ye. (2016). Hromadianske suspilstvo yak subiekt formuvannia systemy publichnoho upravlinnia [Civil society as a subject of formation of the public administration system]. In Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia v umovakh informatsiinoho suspilstva: vitchyznianyi i zarubizhnyi dosvid [Public management and administration in the conditions of the information society: domestic and foreign experience] (pp. 211-250). ZDIA. URL: https://old-zdia.znu.edu.ua/gazeta/monodrupradmin_214.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Sydorchuk, O.H. & Handiy O.O. (2019). Instytutsiine zabezpechennia derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia sotsialnoi bezpeky [Institutional support of state regulation of social security]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu - Economic Bulletin of Donbass, 1, 157-163 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchak, O.V. (2017). Instytutsiinyi mekhanizm derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Institutional mechanism of state administration]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia - Effectiveness of state administration, 1, 53-63 [in Ukrainian].
Liudska hidnist. Motyvatsii chynnosti prav liudyny. Zbirka prohramnykh dokumentiv Robochoi hrupy “Liudska hidnist i prava liudyny” Nimetskoi komisii “Justitia et Pax” [Human dignity. Motivations for the validity of human rights. Collection of program documents of the Working Group "Human Dignity and Human Rights" of the German Commission "Justitia et Pax"]. (2022). Per. z nim. Natali Komarovoi ta Halyny Diachok. Kyiv: Dukh i litera. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=QXxxEAAAQBAJ&dq="інституційна+дієвість"&hl=uk&source=gbs_navlinks_s [in Ukrainian].
Ros, O.H. (2019). Poniattia ta sutnist normatyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia instytutsiinoi spromozhnosti predstavnytskykh orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [The concept and essence of regulatory and legal support of the institutional capacity of representative bodies of local self-government]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid - Investments: practice and experience, 18. 97-100 [in Ukrainian].
Zhukova, L. (2017). Instytutsiina stiikist derzhavy v umovakh hlobalnoi nestabilnosti [Institutional stability of the state in conditions of global instability]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo - Economy and society, 13, 3-7 [in Ukrainian].
