FEATURES OF STATE ADMINISTRATION IN PART OF THE TEMPORARY OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF UKRAINE. CREATION, CONCEPTS OF LEGAL FRAMEWORKS, IMPLEMENTATION IN PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2024.1.4Abstract
Since 2014, our country has been continuing its struggle to restore its territorial integrity and sovereignty. The current state of legislation regarding the regulation of the legal status of temporarily occupied territories indirectly regulates social relations and state mechanisms in such administrative-territorial units. The article examines modern state management approaches to regulating social relations and preserving national interests in temporarily occupied territories. From a legal point of view, the legal regime can be established, changed or abolished exclusively by the laws of Ukraine, however, the regulation of some social relations can be delegated to lower levels of state administration, in particular to regional state administrations, and during martial law – to regional military administrations . It is worth noting that in the conditions of repelling armed aggression on the part of the Russian Federation, the territories immediately adjacent to active hostilities acquire a similar de facto status. Modern legislation does not fully regulate the status of such territories, which negatively affects the normal functioning of state mechanisms in such a part of the state, as well as the real opportunity for citizens to properly exercise the provided rights and legitimate interests. The article examines the current state of legislation regulating state policy in the de-occupation and reintegration of part of the territory of Ukraine. The mechanism of de-occupation of temporarily occupied territories should be understood as a complex of principles, methods, forms and measures carried out by the state by public authorities, international entities that directly perform functions related to compliance with international law and world order, as well as civil society in relation to the chosen method the de-occupation of part of Ukraine from the control of the Russian Federation, as well as the reintegration of the planned regions, including the restoration of internal sovereignty regarding the distribution and implementation of state programs and the chosen vector of state administration. To date, there are several mechanisms for the de-occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine. The article examines the mechanisms and forms of implementation of state policy in the field of deoccupation of the state territory.
References
Bakumenko, V. D., & Nadolishnii, P. I. (2003). Teoretychni ta orhanizatsiini zasady derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Theoretical and organizational principles of public administration]. Kyiv: Milenium [in Ukranian].
Iliashko, O. O. (2017). Osoblyvosti pravovoho rezhymu aneksovanykh ta okupovanykh terytorii [Peculiarities of the legal regime of annexed and occupied territories]. Pryvatne ta publichne parvo, 4, 7-8 [in Ukranian].
Kaminska, N. V. (2022). Deokupatsiia yak instrument vidnovlennia terytorialnoi tsilisnosti Ukrainy: zahalnoteoretychna kharakterystyka ta tendentsii zakonotvorchosti [Deoccupation as a tool for restoring the territorial integrity of Ukraine: general theoretical characteristics and trends in law-making]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 1, 50–52 [in Ukranian].
Kaminska, N. V., & Demydenko, V. O. (2018). Mekhanizm deokupatsii ta reintehratsii tymchasovo okupovanoi terytorii Ukrainy [The mechanism of deoccupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine]. Problemy kompleksnoho zabezpechennia. Nevidkladni zakhody z protydii rosiiskii ahresii z Krymu: politychni, yurydychni, ekonomichni, upravlinski ta sotsialni aspekty – Urgent measures to counter Russian aggression from Crimea: political, legal, economic, managerial and social aspects. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp 68-69). Kyiv, Odesa : Feniks [in Ukranian].
Kaminska N. V., & Pozhydaieva, M. A. (2022). Pravova pryroda sanktsii ta yikh efektyvnist u protydii rosiiskomu vtorhnenni [The legal nature of sanctions and their effectiveness in countering the Russian invasion]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 2, 59–61[in Ukranian].
Kucherenko, O. (1997). Derzhavna polityka: analiz suchasnykh politolohichnykh kontseptsii [European politics: analysis of modern political concepts]. Aktualni problemy reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini – Actual problems of public administration reform in Ukraine. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp 280-281). Kyiv: UADU [in Ukranian].
Nesterovych, V. F. (2017). Verkhovenstvo prava ta zabezpechennia prav liudyny na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriiakh Ukrainy [The rule of law and ensuring human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA, 200, 88–92 [in Ukranian].
Pro zabezpechennia prav i svobod hromadian ta pravovyi rezhym na tymchasovo okupovanii terytorii Ukrainy [The Law of Ukraine «On ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens and the legal regime in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine»] (n.d) http://zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18#Text [in Ukranian].
Riabichko, O. V. (2011). Derzhavna polityka rehuliuvannia pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti: mekhanizmy formuvannia [State policy of business regulation: formation mechanisms. Actual problems of public administration]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1, 72–76 [in Ukranian].
Shaptala, N.K., & Kaminska, N.V. (2022). Derzhavna polityka Ukrainy z pytan tymchasovo okupovanykh terytorii: problemy kontseptualizatsii v suchasnomu naukovomu dyskursi [State policy of Ukraine on issues of temporarily occupied territories: problems of conceptualization in modern scientific discourse]. Filosofski ta metodologicniproblemiprava, 1 (23), 59 [in Ukranian].
