THE ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AS ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF RESOLVING BUSINESS DISPUTES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.3.26

Keywords:

business disputes, alternative ways of resolving business disputes, online court, information technologies, business legal relations

Abstract

The article examines the important role of information technologies in the judicial system and their impact on improving the efficiency and transparency of judicial procedures. It is clarified how information technologies contribute to the collection, storage, processing and transmission of large volumes of information, as well as facilitate access to legal documents. Special attention is paid to the development of electronic documentation, electronic case management systems and the introduction of innovative forms of court proceedings. The article also points to the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian war on Ukraine's judicial system, especially the resolution of economic disputes, and discusses the use of alternative methods of resolving such disputes. The challenges that arise before Ukraine in the context of optimizing the resolution of economic disputes in connection with the war are highlighted. Overall, the article provides readers with a comprehensive overview of the role and impact of information technology in justice, revealing its benefits and challenges. This article analyzes the perspective of the development of online courts as a tool for effective resolution of business disputes. Issues that require attention are highlighted, such as the legal validity of the process and the need to establish standards for electronic evidence, electronic signatures and the authenticity of electronic documents. It is noted that online courts can reduce bureaucratic procedures, speed up the time of consideration of a case and provide wide access to court services. The article emphasizes that online courts cannot completely replace traditional court procedures, especially in situations where the physical presence of the parties or direct contact between them and the judge is necessary for effective resolution of the dispute. It is expedient, especially in connection with Ukraine's acquisition of the status of a candidate for accession to the European Union, to harmonize legislative acts on alternative methods of dispute settlement. It should also be important and useful toThe article examines the important role of information technologies in the judicial system and their impact on improving the efficiency and transparency of judicial procedures. It is clarified how information technologies contribute to the collection, storage, processing and transmission of large volumes of information, as well as facilitate access to legal documents. Special attention is paid to the development of electronic documentation, electronic case management systems and the introduction of innovative forms of court proceedings. The article also points to the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian war on Ukraine's judicial system, especially the resolution of economic disputes, and discusses the use of alternative methods of resolving such disputes. The challenges that arise before Ukraine in the context of optimizing the resolution of economic disputes in connection with the war are highlighted. Overall, the article provides readers with a comprehensive overview of the role and impact of information technology in justice, revealing its benefits and challenges. This article analyzes the perspective of the development of online courts as a tool for effective resolution of business disputes. Issues that require attention are highlighted, such as the legal validity of the process and the need to establish standards for electronic evidence, electronic signatures and the authenticity of electronic documents. It is noted that online courts can reduce bureaucratic procedures, speed up the time of consideration of a case and provide wide access to court services. The article emphasizes that online courts cannot completely replace traditional court procedures, especially in situations where the physical presence of the parties or direct contact between them and the judge is necessary for effective resolution of the dispute. It is expedient, especially in connection with Ukraine's acquisition of the status of a candidate for accession to the European Union, to harmonize legislative acts on alternative methods of dispute settlement. It should also be important and useful to introduce a platform in Ukraine, with the help of which business entities and ordinary people will be able to settle disputes in a pre-trial procedure, using alternative ways of protecting rights.

References

Про медіацію: Закон України від 16 листопада 2021 р. № 1875-IX. База даних «Законодавство України». URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1875-20#Text

Оголошення про створення та забезпечення функціонування трьох підсистем (модулів) ЄСІТС. Офіційний веб-сайт «Судова влада України». URL: https://court.gov.ua/press/news/1173657

Єдиний веб-портал органів виконавчої влади України «Урядовий портал». URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/service/elektronnij-sud

Regulation (EU) № 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) № 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR). Інформаційний веб-портал « EUR-Lex». URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013R0524

Ізарова І.О. Альтернативні та інтерактивні способи вирішення транскордонних спорів: досвід ЄС та перспективи України. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. 2015. Вип. 32. Т. 2. С. 36–40.

Деревянко Б.В., Грещук Г.І., Туркот О.А. Застосування альтернативних способів захисту прав суб’єктів господарювання: українські реалії та досвід країн ЄС. Економіка та право. 2023. № 1. С. 34–41.

Рекомендації для медіаторів щодо підготовки та проведення онлайн-медіації, затв. рішенням від 10 листопада 2021 р., протокол № 32. Національна асоціація медіаторів України. URL: http://namu.com.ua/ua/downloads/on-linemediation/Рекомендації%20для%20медіаторів%20_%20онлайн-медіація.pdf

Подковенко Т.О. Інститут медіації: зарубіжний досвід та українські перспективи. Актуальні проблеми правознавства. 2016. Вип. 1. С. 26–31.

Бондарчук Н.В., Радченко О.Ю. Проведення медіації онлайн: міжнародний досвід та перспективи запровадження в Україні. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. 2023. Вип. 75. Ч. 3. С. 156–161.

Published

2023-08-28