CONTEXTUAL-SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIATION OF INTERGROUP ATTRIBUTES «SOVIET» AND «EUROPEAN» IN THE PRISM OF ETHNO-NATIONAL PERCEPTION OF UKRAINIANS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2023.1.14Keywords:
worldview, personality traits, nation, Ukrainian-Russian warAbstract
The article presents the results of a psychosemantic study of the peculiarities of the interethnic perception of Ukrainians after the beginning of the full-scale Russian invasion of the territory of Ukraine. During the hybrid war, the Russians actively used the concepts of the historical kinship of Ukrainians and Russians within the limits of Soviet history, pointed to the cultural kinship of the Slavic peoples and the differences in traditional values between Ukrainians and European peoples. In the process of preparing for the military invasion, the narratives of the cultural closeness of Ukrainians and Russians were contrasted with the narratives of the «Banderivites», «Galicians», who represented the part of Ukrainian society that was integrated into the European cultural environment. The study used the procedure of J. Kelly's semantic differential and factor-semantic modeling. Based on the results of the research, it was found that it is characteristic for Ukrainians to use the «European» construct in the process of interethnic perception in combination with other personal characteristics that relate to the specifics of socioeconomic interaction. The attribute «Soviet» is not used by the researched, Russia is not identified with the Soviet Union, at the level of the mass consciousness of Ukrainians, Russia and the Soviet Union are distinct national groups that have no common features. According to the results of the research, we can state that in the prism of the interethnic perception of Ukrainians, there is a tendency to differentiate other national groups according to the principle «European – not European», and the attributes «Soviet», «Russian» turned out to be completely unsustainable for the search for a certain group affinity. In the context of informational and psychological confrontation, any attempt to use the ideas of ethnic, cultural, historical affinity between Ukrainians and Russians will have no results.
References
Васютинський, В., & Фролова, О. (2012) Стереотипи взаємного сприймання етнічних українців і росіян. Київ : Імекс-ЛТД
Горбунова В. В. (2002) Психологічні особливості детермінації етнічної свідомості у юнацькому віці. Актуальні проблеми психології. 3.(2). 60–65.
Кириченко, В. (2017) Зміни стереотипів міжетнічного сприйняття українців північно-західного регіону в період з 2002 по 2015 рік. Studia Politologica Ucraino-Polona. №6. 137–144
Кириченко, В. (2020) Особистість у сучасному інформаційному суспільстві. Житомир: Вид-во ЖДУ імені Івана Франка.
Мазяр, О. (2022) «...он чєловєк нє совєцкій»: хроніка державного злочину. Житомир: Вид-во ТОВ «Видавничий Дім “Бук-Друк”»
Нікольський, В. (2003) Репресивна діяльність органів державної безпеки СРСР в Україні (кінець 1920-х-1950-ті рр.). Історико-статистичне дослідження. Донецьк: Вид-во ДонНУ.
Сапольскі, Р. (2021) Біологія поведінки. Причини доброго і поганого в нас. К.: Наш Формата).
Brubaker, R. (1994) Nationhood and the national question in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Eurasia: An institutionalist account. Theory and Society. 47–78.
Keegan, J. (2011). War and our World. Vintage.
Kelly, G. A. The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. London: Routledge., 1991., (Original work published 1955)
Shin, G. W., Freda, J., & Yi, G. (1999). The politics of ethnic nationalism in divided Korea. Nations and Nationalism, 5(4), 465–484.
Smith, J. (2001). Nation Building and National Conflict in the USSR in the 1920's. Ab Imperio, (3), 221–265.
Troch, P. (2010). Yugoslavism between the world wars: indecisive nation building. Nationalities Papers, 38(2), 227–244.