THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONALIZATION OF STATE SERVICE IN UKRAINE AND SYSTEM OF PROVIDING PROPOSALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2022.3.10Keywords:
institution, professionalization of public service, provider system, rule of law, stakeholder, legislative framework.Abstract
In modern conditions the high quality of public administration and services is a critical aspect of state competitiveness. One of the foundations of ensuring high quality of public administration and services is the professionalization of public service. The purpose of the article is to analyze the peculiarities of development of the institute of professionalization of public service in Ukraine and to formulate proposals on the system of prerequisites of its provision. The article considers the peculiarities of the development of the institute of professionalization of public service in modern Ukrainian realities. Based on analysis of structural peculiarities of staff composition of local authorities of a separate region, taken from previous studies, the author has formed several conclusions of applied character on the direction of focus of tasks of professionalization of public service. The importance of a systemic approach in the task of developing the institute of professionalization of public service was noted, and it was proposed to implement a comprehensive program designed to promote the systemic and sustainable development of the institute of professionalization. A separate focus is aimed at the role of stakeholders in the effective development of the professionalization institute and the provider system. The importance of attracting the support of key stakeholder groups for the effective implementation of a comprehensive change program is noted. Special attention was paid to the importance of involvement of civil servants of various levels as one of the stakeholder groups to reduce the risk of non-acceptance of changes or their sabotage. The importance of formation of public coalitions as an effective lever to accelerate the introduction of changes, acceptance of their results, advocacy of changes among broad groups of stakeholders was noted. The aspect of permanence of changes in the context of development of the institute of professionalization of public service during the transit of power is highlighted separately.
References
Dahlstroem C.. The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption. Political Research Quarterly. 2011. № 65(3). С. 1–13.
Lora E. The State of State Reform in Latin America. Washington DC : Inter-American Development Bank, 2007. 474 c. URL: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/The-State-of-State-Reform-in-Latin-America.pdf (дата звернення: 28.06.2022).
Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Support. Washington DC : World Bank, 2008. 120 c. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6484 (дата звернення: 28.06.2022).
Barnett C. Evaluation Of DFID Country Programmes. London: Department for International Development. 2007. 128 c. URL: https://www.oecd.org/derec/unitedkingdom/39769852.pdf (дата звернення: 28.06.2022).
Mikkelsen K.S., Schuster C., Meyer‐Sahling J., Wettig, M.R. Bureaucratic Professionalization is a Contagious Process Inside Government: Evidence from a Priming Experiment with 3,000 Chilean Civil Servants. Public Administration Review. 2021. № 82(2). С. 290–302.
Sanjay K. Pandey, Domonic Bearfield, Jeremy L. Hall. A New Era and New Concepts in the Study of Race in Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 2022. № 82(2). C. 205–209.
Селіванов С. Професіоналізація публічної служби в Україні. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія : Державне управління. 2021. № 32(71). C. 30–36.
Kroukamp H., Cloete, F. Improving professionalism in South African local government. Acta Academica. 2018. № 50(1). C. 61–80.
Антонова Л., Козлова Л. Професіоналізація державних службовців та службовців органів місцевого самоврядування як напрям реалізації теорії лідерства в публічному управлінні. Державне управління: удосконалення та розвиток. 2020. № 1. С. 1–13.
Kamil K., Fathonah N. The Effect of Independence, Integrity, Professionalism, and Professional Skepticism on the Accuracy of Giving Audit Opinion (The Case of Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia). Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Accounting Research (AICAR 2019). 2020. С. 5–10.
Витко Т. Державний службовець в умовах реформування державного управління в Україні. Аспекти публічного управління. 2018. № 6(3). С. 39–47.
Солоткий С. Концептуальні засади державної служби в Україні: проблемні питання. Філософські та методологічні аспекти права. 2021. № 21(1). С. 127–134.
Стратегія реформування державного управління України на 2022–2025 рр. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/831-2021-%D1%80 (дата звернення: 28.06.2022).
